What I Go To Work For
One other point. For the sake of this blog I work for a company known only as Large Bank, and I used to work for Large Brewer. Sooner or later I'm going to really put the boot in, so lets keep the lights off, eh?
Finally, I cut and paste this out of outlook, and its done that really irritating end a line halfway through thing, which is NFG. Why oh why oh why?
This is a response in two parts. The first is about what we did in
Large Brewer and how that went down with the guys, the second is more
about my own observations on this and the thoughts of friends of mine who
work in IT.
Just to start of with though, what are recognition schemes for?
Now, you'd be within your rights to say, what a daft question, its
obvious. Recognition schemes are there, to, well, recognise people.
Like, duh. Drilling a bit deeper, this means making a bit of a fuss of
someone who's done well and giving them a nice reward, a fountain pen, or
a weekend in the sun, or a slap up feed and a chance to rub elbows with
the great and good. Underneath that though, the ultimate underlying
reason is twofold. 1) make people prefer us as an employer, so they'll
come here in the first place and stay when they do, and 2) once they're
in, persuade them to work harder.
Unfortunately, I'm pretty certain that there are better ways to an
employee's heart than recognition schemes. But first, what happens down
the road and why it doesn't work
Large Brewer
We had a couple of formal recognition schemes, similar to the ones at Large Bank.
We had one process called Making A Difference (MAD), which was developed
and implemented by yours truly, in which employees could nominate their
peers for an award. The award was a Mont Blanc pen and a grand gala
dinner at Gleneagles. People's names were also published on the intranet
and in the company magazine.
After the conclusion of a large project we also used to reward IT staff
with holiday vouchers. The idea for that was to both reward people and
make them take some time off after several months in crunch mode.
In terms of building engagement, I'm not sure that either of them was
particularly successful. The holiday vouchers might have stopped a couple
of nervous breakdowns by making people lie on a beach for a week, but
that's about it. In fact, they jarred a lot of people off, because some
people got more vouchers than others and they couldn't see why, or they
couldn't redeem the voucher against they kind of holiday they wanted, or
they'd have preferred cash etc etc. In short, I saw no evidence
whatsoever that anyone stayed, joined or worked harder because of the
schemes. It was good to make a fuss of people who had toiled away in the
shadows for years, but we didn't need a formal programme to do that.
General Notes & Jottings On Recognition & Reward In IT
This is an article by a chap called Joel Spolsky. He's a very very good
programmer, used to work at Microsoft and a bunch of other places. He now
runs his own business in NYC. He's also got a lot of very interesting
things to say about managing people, and programmers in particular.
Here's the full article:
http://joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000070.html
The key points are this:
* formal recognition schemes are counter productive and downright
damaging
* performance reviews are counter productive as well, because if you
get a cracking one, you just feel ok, but if you get a 3 or less, you feel
gutted. They upset more people than they motivate
And this is the reward scheme he's put in place at his own company:
http://joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000038.html
He has a number of other interesting things to say about motivating and
rewarding IT people. I spent a while over Christmas talking about this
with a mate of mine who works in IT, me coming from an HR point of view,
and him as a hacker. (That's hacker as in good programmer, not as in
hack-into-the-CIA-mainframe-and-start-world-war-III, by the way.) We came
up with a few points after a lot of discussion (and a few beers). One is
generic, the others depend on the type of IT person you mean.
Generically, we agreed that the kind of recognition that works is the
informal kind from the business to the person. This is the same whether
its to a helpdesk or a programmer or what have you. There's no need for
formal schemes, they just get in the way (see above.) This recognition is
most effective when it come from a senior person in the business direct to
the recipient, not via their manager, though a cc to the manager is always
nice! Its simply good to feel appreciated and you don't need a branded
scheme to do it. IT people are a cynical bunch.
For people that actually write code for a living, its a bit more
complicated. I think if you are a knowledge worker, like a programmer,
then work environment is vital. Joel goes on and on about giving these
people their own offices where they can code away all day in peace without
getting distracted or their flow broken. We want them to spend as much
time in the zone as possible, so anything we can do to help that has got
be worth it.
The next thing is about kit. IT types love computers, so if they want
three flat screen monitors so they can see different things at once, or a
faster machine, or a palm pilot or a PowerBook to use at home, let them
have it. It costs less than a weekend in Athens and will make them very
happy. My friend tells a story about walking into his boss's office to
ask for a new laptop because his previous one was getting old. To his
utter astonishment his boss agreed, and his new laptop, a real cutting
edge one, arrived later that day. It made him think the company was
brilliant.
The final thing is about how they are managed. This is more important
than any recognition scheme on the face of the earth. In my own humble
opinion, the role of a manager of knowledge workers is to move things out
of their people's way to let them get on with it. This doesn't mean
fighting their battles for them, but it does mean keeping the battle field
clear. Good managers give their people clear tasks, the tools and the
support they need, and then let them get on with it. Then, when someone
succeeds, they watch the positive feedback roll in.
Oh, and free soda pop also helps.
